Science vs Politics vs Court a recipe for stupidity
August 16th, 2010 by Brad HeapOver the weekend news broke that The Climate Science Coalition (made up of climate change sceptics and members of the extreme-right Act Party) are suing New Zealand’s National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) over NIWA’s temperature record showing warming.
“But it is absurd to try to get a court to declare what is correct science. Science is a system where hypotheses are put forward and tested by evidence that proves or disproves them. To try to have a court declare the country’s temperature is hot or cold is just a stunt.”
When I see this action two things come to mind. The first is the most famous incident involving science vs the church vs the courts: Galileo. While the church won that battle in the short term, in the long term Galileo was shown to be correct and changed the face of science.
The second is how many other pieces of modern science could be challenged by political lobbyists and religious nutcases? Within the field of computer science an emerging area of research in artificial intelligence is in the use of genetic algorithms to breed artificial agents in order to naturally select and improve their abilities. Are those people who don’t believe in evolution going to sue the scientists for using evolution in their research? How absurd can things get?



