The debator in action.

November 12th, 2008

Well I am having issues getting the video online, but here are two stills from a debate I was involved with earlier today. I hope to have the full video online in the next day or so.

Update One: The transcript of my speech as delivered is below. My scripted speech was 571 words long. Once it had rebuttal added in and some ad lib on the front it became 916 words when delivered. And near perfect timing to 15 seconds off the 6 minutes maximum.

Update Two: You should now be able to see the video here:

“THAT lecturing has no place in the university of the 21st century.”

Third Speaker – Affirmative.

Good Afternoon,

The university of the 21st century. It must meet the needs of its most important stakeholder, its students.

And it is currently failing to do so.

Instead it is meeting the needs of what is convenient to staff members, and what is cheap, and what saves money, and what cuts down on budgets. It doesn’t meet the needs of its students and what is needed is engagement.

Lecturing does not engage with students, instead they just become passive listeners, with information by all means going in one ear. But straight out the other.

So far, all we have heard from the negating team is arguments revolving around tradition,
and what is best financially for the university,
and what is the most convenient to university staff members.

And it is clearly apparent that these arguments have been as successful as those who tried to argue against giving women the right to vote or equal rights to all races.

I am here today to say that progress is here, not tradition.

And the negating team will have you believe that it is lecturing that is what we do. No. It is eduction [that] is what we do.

Ladies and Gentlemen: The lecture is dead.

Massey University has a rich 80 year history of educating in the ways of the 20th century.
But it is now time for us, as university staff members, to educate ourselves in how to operate in the 21st. To embrace the change.

We may have the best learning environment for those who grew up in the 20th.
But do we really for the 21st?

As Associate Professor Lineham pointed out in his opening address the 20th century university, the past was about the group, educating the masses as easily and as cheaply as possible.

But the 21st century is about the student, and it is about the individual and how we can be the best for them.

To be a successful university in this modern times we need to carefully consider what students are looking for in their education.

And what are they looking for?

Our never ending series of surveys often comes up with the same series of buzz words namely:

Quality
Interaction
Accessibility
Relevance
Enjoyment
and Innovation

I ask you what do these words really mean to us?

But most importantly where does the word lecture fit in?

It doesn’t.
And that is because sitting behind a wooden desk in a lecture hall,
which is modelled on the Colosseum of Rome,
listening to a monotonous drone,
while being actively casted for the next Pink Floyd video
has no place in the 21st century university.

Ladies and Gentlemen, we must stop using these buzz words as buzz words and we must give them clear meaning, definition and use.

Quality isn’t about hiring the best orator to put the students to sleep with.
It is about delivering the best all round package to our students.

We should carefully note that the Government has moved away from a funding model based on how many sheep we can get through the door to one where abouts the quality of education matters.

Interaction isn’t about brave students asking questions in class. It is about group discussions and group projects,
It is about building networks that will last into the workforce
and it is about developing innovative teams of people who will actually go out there into the wide world and define and change it.

Accessibility and Relevance is not about putting some content on Web-CT or Moodle.
It is about being realistic.

It is about the lecture having no place in the university of the 21st century
because it has no place in the world.

Can you hear the funeral bells?

THE LECTURE IS DEAD.

The negating team can say all they like about:

Indigenous knowledge. But have we forgotten that indigenous cultures never had lectures. They had group discussions and tutorials. It was about interaction.

They say that young people like to work with their mentors. I completely agree. Lecturing does not do that. Lecturing makes the young people [become] the people who are being dictated to. And I can tell you now no young person likes to be told what to do.

Why is it that students complain about how their parents are lecturing them? They don’t enjoy it, do they?

I ask you if lecturing was so full and so great to the university then why is this very lecture hall, with you great lectures so empty?

If lecturing was so great, then why are lecturing halls filled with 10% of the class, while the other 90% are sitting on facebook at home?

Why do we have to have open entry? Surely if education, if lecturing was so great, our attendance rates would be 110% and people would be queuing up at the door. It is not happening because lecturing is dead.

And nothing the negating team can do will resurrect the dead lecture.

Change isn’t coming.

It has come.

We must embrace the change or we will be left behind.

We had a mention of a university being ranked 20th in the world. Where are we? We are way down, we are about 200th if not below. They’re not lecturing, they’re being interactive.

If we do not change, we will end up a relic like the Colosseum, looking beautifully stunning with our rich ivory towers but in terms of real relevance we will mean very little to the world.

Thank you.

Being Judged

August 17th, 2008

It is late so I will keep this short and maybe expand it in the next few days.

But something to ponder.

What is the point of judging people?

Isn’t it better to accept them as they are? as they come? as who they are?

We are all different shapes, colours, sizes, and people because God is a very creative artist.

So why try and make people to conform to your ideals?

What makes your ideals right?

Why can’t people be as they are because that is the way God has created them?

Why judge? Why not just accept what has been created and especially accept people as who they are!

Being Yourself

April 4th, 2008

I was asked by a fellow student President today about what defines me.

Well my immediate response was:

  • Computers/Programming
  • Tramping
  • Church

I was then asked how much of that I was doing this year given how busy I was.

My response was very muted because all three have been essentially zero. I have started on a computer science project but haven’t touched it in about two months. I have been tramping twice but that is it all my outdoors exercise this year. And church, well I have been twice, I have been to youth group three times as well but given that a quarter of the year has gone by I have not done much of the things that define me.

I was just reading something someone else I know had written, it was a list of goals. The only problem I noticed with this list of goals was that the majority of them actually had nothing to do with the definition of this person and instead were most of the things that this person’s friends define themselves through. So that made me think. Should we be defining ourselves in who we are or who we could pretend to be by copying the acts of others?

I don’t think we would achieve much more then heartache by trying to take the defining aspects of others and stuff them into our lives. Because at the end of the day we are all unique and all different. If we were all the same we would be boring!

Now I am not saying that we should not have goals and not have role models. However, what I am saying is our goals should be what we can achieve and our role models should be people that we want to be like; not clone.

Life. It is a celebration of diversity not of similarity.

Brad The Fake Graduate

July 13th, 2007

Because the President of the Students’ Association was absent today I had to stand in and do a presentation at the Academic Welcome. This is the second time this week that I have had to wear academic regalia and this time they really messed things about. On Monday I wore black with a blue tie (representing Science) and today I went oh well I want to look cool as a student, so I wore an gold tie that my GF gave me (and got lots and lots and lots of comments about how nice it looked), and the Uni could only supply me with a Masters gown. The funny thing is that I was not allowed to wear a cap or a hood because I have not yet graduated.

p1060399.JPG

Never underestimate where you may end up.

June 6th, 2007

Following on from my post on Christian videos a few days ago, I accidentally stumbled upon some from my own church.

There is a lot from my youth group here.

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=momentumyouthchurch

And finally, I don’t know if I should laugh, cry, or what, but someone leaked video of me performing Weird Al’s White & Nerdy at church camp last year.

2007 Goals

January 1st, 2007

It seems many people with blogs that I know have posted their goals for 2007. So here are most of mine (hey, some have to stay private)

In no order:

  • Maintain A-Grade average
  • Get into post-grad
  • Maintain at least 30 hours a week in study
  • Build deeper relationships with friends
  • Continue to build and grow relationship with God
  • Lead the ASA with professionalism
  • Not get too over-committed in extra curricular activities
  • Regularly attend church
  • Read the Bible everyday
  • Get full drivers license
  • Go tramping at least three times
  • Keep time for personal space
  • Go to the gym at least once a week
  • Live everyday for God
  • Take over the world
  • Live life with a foundation of honesty, trust and integrity