Discovery of water on the moon the biggest scientific discovery of the decade

November 14th, 2009 by Brad Heap

The news this morning from NASA that their LCROSS probe impact with the moon has unearthed water on the moon.

“In the first look at results from the LCROSS mission, which sent a probe crashing into the Cabeus crater near the moon’s south pole, NASA’s main investigator said their instruments clearly detected water, despite the underwhelming plume.

Within the field of view of their instruments, the team measured approximately 220 pounds or about 26 gallons of water.” – http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/11/lcross-water-ice/

This news is potentially massive for any future missions to the moon or even the possibilities of establishing a future permanent moon base. If there is a fresh source of water on the moon it makes the options around supporting a permanent human crew a lot easier.

I can see it now: moon based hydroelectric power dams.

The world is to end in 2012 – only it isn’t

October 17th, 2009 by Brad Heap

If you ever needed anymore proof that many people are far too gullible then look no further than this story in the herald today: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainmehttp://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=10603764nt/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=10603764

For the past 30 years, business leaders, former government officials and scientists have been secretly working on a plan to save humanity from destruction when the Earth collides with another planet on 21 December 2012.

They have set up a covert Institute for Human Continuity which has now agreed to go public and warn the world that there is a 94 per cent probability of “cataclysmic forces” destroying our planet in three years’ time.

Its website offers survival kits and encourages people to sign up for a lottery to decide who will be among the lucky few chosen to be saved.

You are probably thinking that this is an elaborate hoax – you would be right. But hundreds of people have apparently been taken in by the nonsense put out by Sony Pictures as part of a “viral marketing” campaign for its film 2012, set for release next month.

Nasa is taking the issue so seriously that an astronomer at the agency has spoken out to condemn the use of the hoax website, which claims the world is going to end in 2012.

David Morrison said he had received more than 1,000 enquiries from members of the public who were concerned that Nasa scientists were involved in a conspiracy to deny that they were tracking the movements of Nibiru, a hitherto undiscovered planet on a collision course with Earth.

Dr Morrison, a distinguished scientist at Nasa’s Astrobiology Institute, said that the marketing behind the film, distributed by Columbia Pictures, was making some people so scared that he feared they could harm themselves.

“They’ve created a completely fake scientific website. It looks very slick. It talks about this organisation having existed for 30 years and it consists of international scientists and business people and government officials having concluded that there is a 94 per cent chance of the Earth being destroyed in 2012 – and it’s all made up, it’s pure fiction. But obviously some people are treating it seriously,” Dr Morrison told The Independent.

“I’ve even had cases of teenagers writing to me saying they are contemplating suicide because they don’t want to see the world end. I think when you lie on the internet and scare children in order to make a buck, that is ethically wrong,” he said.

There is nothing on the website instituteforhumancontinuity.org to indicate it is a hoax. It states that scientists are tracking a “planet X” on the fringes of the Solar System and mixes real scientific phenomena with complete fiction, such as a simulation of planet X’s near-Earth trajectory.

The website urges people to sign up to a lottery guaranteeing every person of the planet an equal chance of survival in 2012 with the offer of a place in one of the Institute for Human Continuity’s “safe havens”. Only a small Sony Pictures copyright notice at the bottom of the screen and a link to the film’s own website give any hint that this is a purely fictional website.

Dr Morrison said the idea of a mystery planet called Nibiru dates back 30 years to fictional books about supposed predictions of ancient Summerian astrologers. It was taken up by others linking a 2012 planetary collision with the end of the Mayan calender. Interest in the idea has resurfaced in the lead-up to the film’s release, Dr Morrison said. “It is too bad, but there is no law against lying on the internet or anywhere else except in a court of law.”

Vikki Luya, Sony’s publicity director, said: “It is very clear that this site is connected to a fictional movie. This can readily be seen in the logos on the site, including the Sony Pictures Digital copyright line and the reference to the ‘2012 Movie Experience’. It is also evident in the user-generated videos, as well as the numerous online references to this marketing campaign.”

Dumbarses.

New Moon == New Earth?

October 10th, 2009 by Brad Heap

The news that NASA’s impact with the moon failed to create the huge dust cloud that was predicted has left me wondering if that is evidence that the moon is a lot younger than previous thought. And if this is true then could it also hold that the earth is also a lot younger than the commonly held thought.

Now first I will give a disclaimer I am no moon or space expert, I only hold a passing interest in the subject, and I am happy to be corrected or proved wrong on any scientific information I present below.

Until this morning the view was that the moon was covered in a huge amount of dust (and potentially ice) built up over many millions of years by collisions with space objects (comets and the like), so like the sand on a beach covers the real surface sometimes to metres deep, the moon dust acted like sand and covered the real surface of the moon by many metres of dust.

However the failure to kick up this dust may suggest a few things.

  • The moon is not as old as we expected and therefore there is a lot less dust on the planet.
  • The dust on the moon is a lot stronger than we expected, therefore the chemical bonds and electrostatic bonds between each piece of dust is much stronger than we expected and therefore there was less of a dust storm (a lot like how mud is a lot more sticky than dry dirt)
  • That the ice inside the dust made the dust a lot more sticky than we were expecting.
  • Although the moon collects dust over time there may have been much bigger collisions in the past that have kicked a lot of this dust back into space, so while the moon acts as a giant vacuum cleaner stopping things hitting earth, it may every so often get its own bag emptied with a huge collision.
  • The dust on the moon accumulates much slower than we expected, this could mean there have been less collisions with the moon in the past then what we see today.

My personal preference is for the first idea to hold true, that would give creationists a much stronger leg to stand on if they can show the moon is a lot younger than we thought it was, however, at the same time I am very interested in if any my other ideas hold water. NASA will hopefully reveal some more info on what happened and while the dust cloud didn’t arrive as expected in the next few days, I am hoping it is exciting rather than just another typically NASA we stuffed up moment like has happened plenty of times before.

Jupiter no Io

September 4th, 2009 by Brad Heap

Photos from tonight. Still can’t beat that one from the other night.

P1100025

P1100037

Satellite, Star or Planet?… It’s Jupiter

September 3rd, 2009 by Brad Heap

I ended up going to be very late last night thanks to assignments.

But the one positive thing to come of going to bed late was the fullness of the moon. I got a few photos of it and then noticed a very bright object to its right.

P1090933

At first I thought it may be a satellite and I tried to zoom up on it to get some good shots, most of them turned out blurred or weird because of the lack of light and long exposure time, but I did get a few good ones.

Panasonic DMC-FZ5 1/8s f/8.0 ISO: 100 12x Optical Zoom

Panasonic DMC-FZ5 1/8s f/8.0 ISO: 100 12x Optical Zoom

At this point I began to notice the odd colors coming off it, still convinced it was some form of satellite I zoomed up onto the digital zoom and changed the settings to TIFF format and ISO 400

P1090942

At this point I was thinking okay I have some really bright star, maybe Mars.

It wasn’t until this morning I decided to look up a star map. And what do you know?

Star Map for 00:00 Sep 3 2009 NZST, Look right next to the moon.

So off to the star dome website we go for confirmation.

http://www.ectoolset.com/func/Newsdetails.asp?sid=440&id=10033

Another planet visible at this time is Jupiter. High in the sky to the east, Jupiter is the brightest thing in the evening sky apart from the Moon, making it easily noticeable. A small telescope or good binoculars will reveal some or all of Jupiter’s four largest moons, named the Galilean moons after their 17th century discoverer, Galileo.

You can see the moons too? Okay time for some image correction, Increasing the shadows on the picture and we have a moon there (with a green tinge).

Moon on top of planet

Moon on top of planet

And I am loving the red-shift too.

Update the moon will be IO and it is green in real life it is not a camera trick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_%28moon%29

Latest Shuttle Launch

August 31st, 2009 by Brad Heap

I missed the launch of the latest shuttle mission on Saturday as I was at work. But it was a night launch and spectacular at that.

One small step for man, one giant leap for… robotkind?

July 19th, 2009 by Brad Heap

40 years ago this week man first conquered the moon. And the first man on the moon Neil Armstrong uttered those immortal words

That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.

But has it really been a giant leap for mankind? During a three year period between 1969 – 1972 we six manned missions landed on the moon. But in the 37 years since we last landed there no one has gone beyond the orbit of the earth. So much for those holidays to the moon, Jupiter and Mars. So much for that giant leap.

What did however have a giant leap was robotkind. In the past 40 years we have sent probes out of this solar system, into the sun, and off to investigate every planet in the solar system. We have landed probes on Venus. And had our best success on Mars where to this day two little robots continue to drive around, having robot fun and teaching us heaps at the same time.

But some 150 or so flights into space later what have we really achieved for mankind? We have an International Space Station that is well behind schedule but at the same time the largest thing ever constructed in space, so large that it can be seen from earth with the naked eye. We have GPS, Satellite TV, and a number of other cool gadgets that have completely changed the way we do business on earth through the use of space. And we have used space telescopes to see where no man has seen before.

So where to now? Do we go back to the moon and then Mars as NASA is now finally pursuing. Or do we just stay in orbit. Doing cool experiments and finding ways to better our lives on earth? I for one would still love to own a holiday home on Mars before I die.

40 years on and things still look the same

July 19th, 2009 by Brad Heap

In the next day or so I am planning quite a large post reflecting on 40 years since the moon and what have we achieved through that giant leap for mankind. But while I am still getting my thoughts together over that and researching some stuff I came across this cool video from NASA that was released in November of last year showing their plans to get man back to the moon. With the exception of separate personal and cargo launches the rest looks very similar to that of the old Saturn V style rockets.

Star Background to mark 40 years since Apollo 11

July 18th, 2009 by Brad Heap

Okay as a way of marking the 40th anniversary of Man landing on the moon on July 20th I have changed the background of the site from plain grey to a nice starfield. It may actually stay that way until I find some other cool backdrop.

I haz evidence from the Moon

July 18th, 2009 by Brad Heap

Okay, enough LOL Cats for one evening, but this is cool.

NASA have released new photo graphs taken from their new Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter of the original lunar landing sites, complete with pictures of what was left behind: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html

Bad Astronomy blog make some interesting points too: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/17/apollo-landing-sites-imaged-by-lro/

Apollo may seem like ancient history, but those artifacts on the Moon are still sitting there, in many ways as fresh as the day they were placed there.

In all of human history, there are many dividing lines we can arbitrarily assign. Before and after the use of atomic weapons, before and after the invention of the light bulb, before and after this war or that.

But there is one dividing line that can inspire us, fill us with wonder, make us dream of bigger goals, higher aspirations, better ways to live our lives for the future. And that is the dividing line between the time we were a race shackled to the ground, confined to a single planet… and the time a human being stepped foot on another world.

And there it is, in pictures and in fact. This is what these pictures mean. We humans spend a lot of time looking around, looking out, looking down. But sometimes, for just a brief moment, we look up. We did it once before, and it’s time to do it again.

It is like time is standing still and looking back at us. Some of us believe that the pyramids and other amazing structures were left behind to us by aliens from other lands. Now we have left evidence of our prior existance on another world and imagine if an alien lifeform came across it would they start an eagar search for life on that world?